The Senate yesterday mandated its
Committee on Finance to begin a full-scale investigation into the alleged
missing $49.8 billion from the coffers of the Federal Government.
The committee is expected to
conclude its findings and submit report in less than seven days.
This followed a point of order raised under matter of urgent importance by Senator Olubunmi Adetunbi, APC Ekiti North, who relied on the Senate Order 42, not only to draw the attention of the upper legislative chamber to the allegation but also requested that it carried out an in-depth probe of the missing fund.
This followed a point of order raised under matter of urgent importance by Senator Olubunmi Adetunbi, APC Ekiti North, who relied on the Senate Order 42, not only to draw the attention of the upper legislative chamber to the allegation but also requested that it carried out an in-depth probe of the missing fund.
Value
The money is said to be the value of crude oil export and proceeds from the Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation, NNPC, expected to be lodged in the Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN.
The money is said to be the value of crude oil export and proceeds from the Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation, NNPC, expected to be lodged in the Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN.
Senator Adetunbi, who is the Vice
Chairman, Senate Committee on Planning and Budgeting, at the plenary,
said: “There has been a raging debate on the issue of missing money from
the coffers of the Federal Government of Nigeria.
“Today, all papers carried the
report on $49.8 billion that has not been remitted to the federation account.”
CBN’s letter on the account
He further explained that the nation’s apex bank, the Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN, had written on the account from January 2012 to July 2013, urging the Senate to carry out a holistic investigation on the matter.
He further explained that the nation’s apex bank, the Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN, had written on the account from January 2012 to July 2013, urging the Senate to carry out a holistic investigation on the matter.
“Mr President, as a parliament, this
is a very grave issue. The parliament owes a duty or responsibility to the
public to ensure that we get to the bottom of this issue for purposes of public
information and for purposes of integrity of this parliament, because
appropriation and revenue is the major responsibility of this parliament,” he
said.
Senate President, David Mark, who
presided over the session where the issue came up, said the matter could not be
instantly treated because, according to him, there is no detailed information
before the Senate yet.
Allegation
Besides, he said the allegation which Senator Adetunbi was relying on was a newspaper report, adding that he had earlier in a meeting with the senator on the issue, promised that the Senate Committee on Finance would handle the matter.
Besides, he said the allegation which Senator Adetunbi was relying on was a newspaper report, adding that he had earlier in a meeting with the senator on the issue, promised that the Senate Committee on Finance would handle the matter.
“You have come under Order 42, you
know what you showed to me was the newspaper report and I also told you that on
the basis of that, since you don’t have all the details, that I will refer it
to the committee and the committee will get all the details and bring their
report here.
“You know that was my discussion
with you. So, this new dimension of a letter coming from Central Bank was not
discussed with me. But whatever it is, I think rather that because we don’t
have the details at this point, we cannot go into any further detailed
discussion.
“So, I will refer it to the
committee on finance. I am just saying what you have discussed with me and that
is what I am going to do, because the newspaper is what you brought to me, so
you will lay the newspaper on the table and then I will refer the matter to the
committee. I want the details, “he said.
Senate President’s position
The Senate President’s position that the issue be handled by the Committee on Finance attracted resistance from some members of the All Progressives Congress, APC, who suggested that rather than the committee, the issue should be directed to the Senate Committee on Public Account but Mark stood his ground.
The Senate President’s position that the issue be handled by the Committee on Finance attracted resistance from some members of the All Progressives Congress, APC, who suggested that rather than the committee, the issue should be directed to the Senate Committee on Public Account but Mark stood his ground.
....9ja na wah ooo!
No comments:
Post a Comment